Why Trump Plan to Force Pakistan and Saudi Arabia Into the Abraham Accords is Doomed

Why Trump Plan to Force Pakistan and Saudi Arabia Into the Abraham Accords is Doomed

Donald Trump loves the art of the deal, but his latest Middle East gamble shows he doesn't understand the room.

In a massive Truth Social post following a high-level conference call with regional heavyweights, Trump demanded that Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey immediately sign onto an expanded version of the Abraham Accords. He tied this directly to ongoing negotiations with Iran, basically pitching a grand bargain where everyone shakes hands, recognizes Israel, and ushers in a regional economic boom.

It sounds great on paper if you ignore the last few years of Middle East history. Instead of a diplomatic breakthrough, Trump's aggressive push met a wall of silence from Riyadh and an immediate, public shutdown from Islamabad.

The reality is that the geopolitical landscape of 2026 isn't the same as 2020. Trying to force a massive normalization pact while the region is still bleeding from the Gaza war isn't just overly optimistic. It's totally detached from reality.

The Immediate Rejection From Islamabad

Pakistan didn't even try to be diplomatic about its refusal. Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif went on local television and made it clear that joining any accord clashing with Pakistan's fundamental ideology is out of the question.

You have to understand how deep this runs in Pakistan. It is not just about state policy; it's a core identity issue. Asif explicitly pointed out that Pakistan is the only country whose passports explicitly state they are valid for all countries except Israel.

Trump reportedly pitched this directly to Pakistan's Army Chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir. In Pakistan, the military holds the real cards on foreign policy. But even for a powerful army chief, recognizing Israel right now would be political suicide. The public anger over the thousands of Palestinian casualties in Gaza is too high. No Pakistani leader, military or civilian, can sign that paper without sparking massive domestic unrest.

Why Saudi Arabia is Not Biting

Trump's plan relies heavily on Saudi Arabia. He demanded an "immediate signing" by the Saudis and Qataris, believing everyone else would just follow their lead.

But Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman isn't going to bail Trump out here. Before the Gaza conflict erupted, Riyadh was moving toward a historic normalization deal with Israel. That deal was heavily back-channeled by Washington. But the political price of admission has skyrocketed.

The Saudis have made their position predictable and steady. There is no normalization without a credible, irreversible path to a Palestinian state. Trump's framework tries to bypass the Palestinian issue entirely, focusing instead on trade, investment, and a unified front against Iran. That worked with the UAE and Bahrain in 2020, but it won't work with Saudi Arabia today.

As the custodian of Islam's holiest sites, Saudi Arabia carries a religious and political weight that the UAE doesn't. If Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman signs a deal while Gaza is in ruins and the West Bank is simmering, he loses his leadership status in the Muslim world. He knows it. Trump apparently doesn't.

The Flawed Iran Link

What makes Trump's latest push distinct is how he tied it to US-Iran negotiations. He claimed that regional leaders would be "honored" to have Iran itself join the Abraham Accords once a deal is reached.

This shows a fundamental misunderstanding of why the Abraham Accords were created in the first place. The original 2020 agreements weren't built on sudden regional love for Israel. They were an anti-Iran coalition. The UAE and Bahrain wanted a security umbrella against Tehran, and Israel offered that.

Trying to use the Abraham Accords as a vehicle to integrate Iran while simultaneously demanding that anti-Iran and pro-Iran states sign the same piece of paper makes no sense. Reports from the high-level call indicate Trump's proposal was met with awkward silence from several leaders. They are watching Washington negotiate with Tehran while American strikes still hit targets in the region to maintain a fragile ceasefire. The mixed signals from Washington are making regional capitals highly uneasy.

Moving Past the Hype

If you're tracking Middle East policy, don't buy into the hype of an imminent, massive regional signing ceremony. The administration wants a quick victory to justify its messy regional engagements, but foreign policy by tweet doesn't change structural realities.

For businesses and analysts looking at regional stability, look at the concrete actions instead of the rhetoric. Watch the bilateral trade numbers between Israel and the existing accord members like the UAE, which have remained resilient despite the political tension. Watch the actual progress of the US-Iran backchannel talks.

The next step for regional diplomacy isn't a grand, all-encompassing treaty. It's micro-agreements on border security, maritime trade protection, and humanitarian corridors. The days of bypassing the Palestinian issue to secure mega-deals with major Muslim powers are over for now. If Washington wants real stability, it needs to stop chasing the ghost of 2020 and start dealing with the fractured reality of today.

ST

Scarlett Taylor

A former academic turned journalist, Scarlett Taylor brings rigorous analytical thinking to every piece, ensuring depth and accuracy in every word.